Do I have your attention?
I was sitting in a hotel restaurant having breakfast overlooking the Sydney harbor the morning I read the story a couple weeks ago. While it’s half a world away and it may not have crossed your radar, the cost of the breach of the South Korean national identification database is expected to exceed a billion dollars.
I wonder if it’s enough.
As I have spoken with many who are responsible for the day-to-day activities involved in maintaining enterprise technology, I often hear that there isn’t enough impetus to invest in infrastructure security beyond the now-traditional firewalls and IPS/IDS technologies. They all recognize that such reactive tools are essential, but that they only enter the equation after the bad guys are already in the network.
What if they could actually keep them out?
Doing so requires more. It requires proactive cyber attack prevention. It requires getting your arms around everything that is possible on your network and not just what is currently happening or has happened in the past. The distinction is critical, and often missed because it is so difficult to understand the millions of potential paths, the implications of the compounding effects of routers, firewalls, and load balancers quickly become overwhelming. Many organizations punt on the overall picture and focus in on individual devices and cleaning up their configurations, and while such work is good and important, it ignores the bigger picture: if there are circumstances, however unlikely, that would allow packets to circumvent the controls or the intrusion systems, all the defenses in the world will fail to protect the organization.
Many of the breaches we are seeing these days are the result of these kinds of situations.
So, will a billion dollar bill be a sufficient wake up call for those responsible for investing in cyber security?